The Unscathed Hullaballoo At Cannes
What happened in Cannes Film Festival 2018, has been gathering impetus since decades in Hollywood. If I might ask why Cannes has a colossal impact on the society, it has gathered huge furore over the years owing to bagging the Palme d’Or, an award that has bestowed critical and commercial success on many films in the past. Marche du film that has been placed on a pedestal of grave seriousness over the seven decades is not just a night of starry sightings but a sacred revelry of films and producers. Cannes has played a commendable role in premiering some of the world’s most critically acclaimed films, movies that have mirrored dominant ideology steeped in society, movies blatantly exposing the myths and symbols present in the society.
This year what grabbed media attention, apart from stars parading in stone studded, gleaming outfits, was a starry gathering of known countenances in cinema, like Kristen Stewart, Patty Jenkins, Cate Blanchett and Salma Hayek. Decoding the total number of women who took part in this dissent is also a matter of significance. 82 is representative of the number of female directors who were given the space to ascend the stairs draped in red in 1946, in sharp contrast to the 1,688 male directors, who were privileged enough to share the same space.
Hollywood As The Epicentre Of Bigotry And Sexism
What has not altered in Hollywood is the downright sexist culture that is astonishingly prevalent in one of the most influential domains of movie-making, one that has produced from its bags films like Pulp Fiction, Deadpool, Taxi Driver to name a few. Pay gap, sexual exploitation, overt sexual innuendos and serving the voyeuristic pleasure of audiences who would prefer females within the framework of a camera rather than the other side. Many a time such brazen acts have been conveyed by media, bringing a perfect storm within the calm of the dining rooms, making headlines in tabloids or evening newspapers and subsiding eventually. What happened in Cannes is the cumulative effort of women coming to the forefront, making a statement, voicing their concerns. However there is still a lot of riot in the making till every studio, actor, director are forced to address the long-dwindling issue of gender inequality in mainstream Hollywood.
Amidst all the hustle-bustle in Cannes, which has become the talk of the town mainly because of the paparazzi and star-studded spectacle, the demonstration is nothing short of the darkest hour before the dawn. Cannes made it explicit that women oppression is not restricted to any single class, profession, colour or race, it is pervasive and clutches the white as well as the black. Honestly, I have not witnessed any major coverage of the event by news pages that offer a religious elucidation of fashion and drapery flaunted by well-known Bollywood faces. It would be truly unfortunate if such news is draped in finery and dispatched to the audience as just another component of starry gaiety.
Is Media Transmitting It Wrong?
Commercialization of these events and protests are not uncommon in the trajectory of film and media. Such demonstrations, events and acts of raising a voice against downright preposterous acts of subjugations have been turned into a controversy, a tool for engagement of readers, political gains, or a pseudo-intellectual topic for a casual evening talk show. As a reader, I have felt the direct subversion of these events, over-exploitation by the media, making it lose its final significance by either butchering it with language or deliberate conversion into publicity. So the one question that pops out in readers’ mind is, should these events then be detached from their backdrop and be viewed in their own quintessential self? If these events are failing to stir the commixture of wrong and baseness still in abundance, then we probably have taken the wrong direction.
When I was in University, Oprah Winfrey turned towards a startled and numbed audience present at the Golden Globes Awards to make a powerful speech on misogyny, racism, abuse which wealth and stature can hardly keep at bay. Social media platforms were then populated with a number of interpretations stating the hidden, implicit purpose behind the speech and somewhat the novelty of her speech became lost in the way. This can jeopardize the power of narrative in a public platform, where the truth will become a pliant tool for politics. It snatches away the importance of the person who tries to place herself/himself as the voice blowing the trumpet to welcome the wind of change.
Cannes is a symbol of independence, over the last seven decades it has played an embracing host to many controversial films, lesser-known cerebral films, blockbusters and has made itself known for its valour and audacity. Tossing off a historically symbolic protest that Cannes witnessed would not just be a sign of ignorance and oblivion, but of predesigned suppression of a voice that has the capability to unnerve the hushed fusion of oppression and bias.