[VoxSpace Tech] Online Propaganda : How Russia Used Facebook And Twitter To Make Trump The POTUS

The 2016 Russian interference revealed how social media giants became battlegrounds for geopolitical influence—lessons that remain critically relevant as digital propaganda evolves globally.

Key Takeaway

The 2016 US election interference exposed how state actors exploited social media platforms’ scale and targeting capabilities to manipulate public opinion, sow discord, and undermine democratic processes—a watershed moment that revealed the dangers of unregulated digital influence on global politics.

Facebook, Twitter and Google – The Giants Of Propaganda

There are about 2 Billion active users on Facebook and on Google, we have 40,000 search queries per second. A number of people using both sites are so large that it is impossible to imagine the number by the human mind. Now as they both have such large bases of people following them doesn’t it make sense that they are careful about how their influence is used?

I mean just imagine the huge impact that it could have on peoples behaviour if these sites were not regulated properly. Well, guess what? You don’t need to. If you haven’t heard about it, Facebook has just released the information that Russia spent about $100,000 on fake ads that promoted Trump while condemning Hilary Clinton during the 2016 presidential election cycle. These ads also sought to stoke racial and religious tensions. This was shown as Baltimore and Ferguson were specifically targeted with Black Lives Matter ad campaigns. Even ads on gun control were run by them to intensify public discord.

There were 3,000 ads that were connected to about 470 inauthentic accounts and pages on Facebook. It is estimated about 10 million people were able to see it. Additionally, Facebook found 2,200 ads that did not violate its policies but were still of interest. It was also later revealed that such ads also appeared on Instagram which is owned by Facebook.

The Origins Of Fake Accounts – The Play Of Russia

Twitter, on the other hand, had about 200 fake accounts that circulated the same type of message which was backed by Russia. There were ads that were promoted in the form of tweets for about $274,100 by a media network called RT which was flagged as a propaganda arm by the U.S, but it didn’t stop Twitter from continuing from advertising

Lastly, there is Google who has not revealed much about its the ongoing investigation but it is said that Google has located ads worth $53,000 indirectly connected to Russia and about $4,700 in search and display ads directly connected to Russia. This does not take into account what might be found on Youtube.

The impact this might have had on the election is terrifying to contemplate. The fact that there was so little oversight by all three companies has made a lot of people angry. Due to this, there has been a lot of backlash from the U.S government who are now planning on passing a new bill called the Honest Ads Act which asks the companies for more transparency on showing who the ad is bought by as well as to keep copies of political ads that are to be handed over when asked.

Reforms Of Google And Facebook Ads – The Need Of The Hour

The U.S already had a federal law that states clearly that Foreign nationals cannot donate or purchase political ads on “electioneering communications”. But due to lack of foresight, limited rules around political disclosure and an automated ad purchasing system these ads were slipped in.

Now that the problem has been discussed what can we, as the target audience of such attacks, do about it? Well, first and foremost fact check anything in the portal that we read. The media has started focusing more on sensationalised headlines and less on the news so fact-checking should be a rule of thumb for any type of information that you consume. Secondly, remember that this is the Internet, anything can be faked so take in everything that is said with a grain of salt. Lastly, think for yourself if anything sounds stupid it generally is stupid so try to have an informed mind and discuss what you learn with different types of people, so that you can be informed by the way everyone thinks about a topic.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did Russia spend on Facebook ads during the 2016 election?

Russia spent approximately $100,000 on fake advertisements promoting Trump and condemning Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential election cycle. These ads targeted specific regions like Baltimore and Ferguson with Black Lives Matter campaigns to intensify racial and religious tensions among American voters.

How many people saw Russian propaganda ads on Facebook?

An estimated 10 million people were exposed to the 3,000 Russian ads connected to approximately 470 inauthentic accounts and pages on Facebook. Additionally, 2,200 ads that didn’t violate Facebook’s policies were also discovered, and similar propaganda appeared on Instagram.

Did Russian propaganda appear on platforms other than Facebook?

Yes, Russian interference wasn’t limited to Facebook. Twitter also hosted around 200 inauthentic accounts spreading propaganda. The coordinated disinformation campaign spanned multiple social media platforms to maximize reach and impact across different demographic segments.

What topics did Russian propaganda focus on to divide Americans?

Russian actors strategically targeted divisive issues including Black Lives Matter, gun control, racial tensions, and religious discord. By amplifying these polarizing topics through fake accounts and ads, they aimed to deepen societal divisions and sow mistrust in democratic institutions.

Why is the 2016 Russian election interference significant for India?

The 2016 case established a blueprint for state-sponsored disinformation. For India, it highlights how social media platforms can be weaponized during elections and critical moments. Understanding these tactics helps Indians recognize and resist propaganda attempts targeting their own democracy and public discourse.

Disclosure: This article may contain affiliate links. VoxSpace may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through these links, at no additional cost to you. This does not influence our editorial opinions or reviews.

Comments are closed.